Monthly Archives: November 2006

Reuters view of e-learning – Charles Jennings, Global Head of Learning Reuters

Notes based on a presentation by Charles Jennings at the Informatology conference, Reuters, London Thursday, 16th November.

It was a valuable experience to find out what a large blue chip corporations take is on organisational and e-learning. In his keynote speech, Charles set the scene by explaining that high levels of skill do not necessarily correlate with high levels of performance. What is in fact required in organisations is a change from training for skills to ‘learning for performance’.

Charles supported this assertion by offering some statistics that 70% of performance in the workplace is in fact dependent upon environmental factors: the interpersonal skills of the manager, the quality of feedback received, having clear objectives, etc. It is these environmental factors that impact on attitudes and ultimately on behaviours which is the key to performance.

He then went on to argue that It if 70% of performance is indeed determined by environmental factors then straight transfer of knowledge as an approach to training will is no longer be effective – arguably this is still the dominant design for many organisations.

Some further statistics were offered to illustrate the fast pace of change, important for me because they came from two surveys of ‘knowledge workers’ about 10 years apart and represent what they believed is important. The question put to the knowledge workers was something along the lines of ‘Do they believe that the retention of information in their heads is important to do their jobs well?’. In 1986, 75% believed that knowing ‘stuff’ was important for them to do their job well, this had fallen to 15-20% by 1997, and an estimated 8-10% by 2006. The rhetorical question put was “there is an argument that it is in fact better in this day and age not to know anything as information is so quickly out of date!”

Reuters model of e-learning
First, another statistic “On average less that 30% of what people learn in training actually gets used on the job.”

If this statistic is indeed correct and the others quoted above, then the corollary that access to knowledge at the right time is a key factor in improving performance.

Reuters model of e-learning is built around this belief and as such of key importance is the ability to get a package of information to a member of staff anywhere in the world on a specific topic at the moment it is needed. If you think about it, this makes sense as their staff in the field are already successful learners and, for example, a journalist who is faced with the job of interviewing the economic minister of Malawi and writing and article on the current situation in that country and yet who knows little or nothing about Malawi then they need some background and quickly! And as second string, the information also identifies Reuters Communities of Practice where the information originated if the journalist needs to enter into discussion to gain a deeper understanding.

My work in e-Learning has focussed on developing individuals’ critical thinking skills, work focussed competencies, ability to work collaboratively, and self confidence. The Reuters example made me realise just how context specific models for e-learning are.

Ultraversity graduation – online personalisation of learning through community

Ultraversity_graduation Today at Chelmsford Cathedral the first cohort of Ultraversity student researchers who had successfully studied for a BA (Hons), Learning, Technology and Research attended their graduation ceremony.

For most of the 140 graduates, Ultraversity_graduationthis was the first time that they had actually met face to face although they had developed close friendships through a model of learning that has online communities of inquiry at its heart. Communities where mutual feedback and support one of the key ingredients.

This approach to 100% online learning is highly personalised experience but not an isolated and individualised one that can be the end result of many online degrees.

Linking formal and informal learning – Jisc / Cetis conference

Bill Oliver Jisc 2006-20089 strategy

The Jisc mission statement is ‘To provide world-class leadership in innovative use of ICT to support education and research’

Bill explained that the fundamental idea behind enterprise architecture is that it seeks to align organisational structure and functions with ICT structure and functions.

He then explained that the Jisc saw innovation occurring through one of two ways:
A. Bottom up technology driven
B. Top-down demand driven (current dominant model)

The basic process was outlined in 6 stages with the current dominant design being top-down (B). Bill made the argument that there needs to be a lot more bottom up (A).

1. Organisational goals
2. Organisational strategy
3. Organisational product/service
4. Organisational capabilities (including capacities)
5. Organisational practices and processes
6. technology

Bill went on to address the issue of adoption and how change can be brought about. He recognised that in the past Jisc had not worked as closely as it needs to with the different communities. The aim of this is to help those communities map their domain and then identify what are the key prioritised problem areas.

The issue of adoption of innovation was also touched upon with a sharing of the familiar early adopter model. Lastly the need for organisations scenario planning, with institutions taking the Jisc models and frameworks and interpreting the for their own institutions was highlighted as a way forward.

For me, the key issue that wasn’t addressed in this presentation was that of risk and how that feeds into the complex mix of choice and decision making at all levels from individuals through to organisations and politicians.

Jorum – Jisc funded project for the collection, sharing, reuse and repurposing of teaching materials

Jorum is an online repository that offers a searchable collection of learning and teaching resources catelogue. Funded by Jisc, this is a free service for UK F/HEIs and aims to provide long term access to resources. It along with other repositories and services are a part of of the developing Jisc Information Environment. Described as a ‘Service-in-Development’ research as a part of the Jorum project has been underway since 2002 although it was only launced for as users in 2005.

Rationale behind Jorum
Over the years Jisc (as well as other funding bodies) have rightly faced a high degree of criticism over their inability to ensure that good value has been achieved through their funding of research projects whose outcomes are more often that not ‘lost’ once the funding stream has ended. A significant part of the rationale behind Jorum is to provide a mechanism by which projects can meet their deliverables around dissemination in a recognised and robust way.

Participation
All of the content on Jorum is generated by the ‘community’ of contributors with no content being commissioned by the project. Participation is controled at an institutional level through signing up on an either or basis to the following:
- Jorum Contributors – any institution or publicly funded project team that wants to share their learning and teaching materials with colleagues in the UK
- Jorum users – teaching and support staff in institutions who can find, preview, download, reuse and repurpose/re-mix materials for use with learners in their institution

Although individuals can contribute as a part of an institution, this is not anticipated to be the major source of content as Jorum believe that practical difficulties such as the ensuring that material used as a part of a learning object are not copyrighted will prove daunting for an individual.

Once resources are submitted, a team of cataloguers add the metadata although no quality assurance process is appled to the resources themselves. However, a system of peer rating does apply whereby users can identify useful respources (1-5 stars) and attach comments against them.

Points to consider:

1. Jorum understand the need to publicise and have neat ideas such as a quick search for non-members to showcase content (not downloadable) and RSS feed on pre-determined searches
2. The technical developer (Andrew Baxter) understands the need to develop tools so that users can pull apart and re-combine/edit assets into new or adapted learning objects
3. Preservation is recognised as an issue – what happens to old content?
4. Sustainability in the long term is recognised as an issue – how will funding be secured in the long term

Technical
Based on a repository system called intralibrary from Intrallect Ltd.

Objects are moved around via content packaging (a zip file with technical metadata and sequencing instructions, etc.) that allows use in different platforms, VLE, sequencing tools, etc. The software is designed to be highly interoperable, enables linking to other institutional repositories.

User Experience
Although a slightly clunky interface (V2 out in a couple of weeks or so), somewhat surprisingly, a five minute play (running various searches) with the Jorum website did yield some resources that would be useful, for Ultraversity researchers, in developing skills in the realm of criticality and the review of materials – something worth pursuing further!